Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:31:49 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nvi maintainer? Message-ID: <20010708213149.A88227@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010708093745.DB2303811@overcee.netplex.com.au>; from peter@wemm.org on Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 02:37:45AM -0700 References: <20010708032002.D97456@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> <20010708093745.DB2303811@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 02:37:45AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > The next thing is that moving a port to the base system usually has a > pretty chilling effect on the package.. Is that going to OK with regular > vim users who are used to having a dynamic, regularly updated port? Don't worry, if it goes into the base system, I will keep vim as up to date as I current do the port. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010708213149.A88227>