Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 22:56:35 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/37863: Configuration of X corrupts screen, and install lacks wrapper. Message-ID: <20020510225015.G70258-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <200205101420.g4AEK3B85404@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: MM> marck> Well, then what about adding additional checkbox with the comment like MM> MM> How many checkboxes do we need (imagine KDE, GNOME, sub-packages of MM> XFree86 itself, X font packages, other tools live in ports/x11, etc, MM> etc, etc...). Oh yeah, I suppose I've got your point. Anyway, I still suppose two points mentioned woudl hit anyone with X planning to be installed. MM> Are there any criterion that a package should be listed in the MM> separate menu? Hmm... Well, it would be the result of some kind of "common sense" , you know. I suppose there should be the tree of dependencies, with some restrictions, that would be (hopefully) end up in sysinstall, and others would be organized through some extrnal utility.... But -- there is too many botches around... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020510225015.G70258-100000>