Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:36:43 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net, marcus@marcuscom.com, michaelnottebrock@gmx.net, kris@obsecurity.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: howto stop port from installing .la files ? Message-ID: <20030305163643.32f2844b.Alexander@Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20030305144129.GA7505@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302272130150.72813@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20030227223051.GA91669@rot13.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303011335320.738@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <200303011713.19351.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <1046535678.310.5.camel@gyros> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303011634080.738@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20030305153523.7ce0ab1b.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20030305144129.GA7505@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:41:29 +0100
Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> wrote:
> > So far the only reason why we need the .la file is because there's a bug
> > somewhere...
>
> So... basically we need to fix *our* libtool port to provide a smarter
> lt_dlopen port and then we can get rid of all .la files?
Until I or some else looks at the source and identifies a good reason
why I'm wrong: yes.
Ideally it should be done with a recent libtool too in a way which is
acceptable by the authors of libtool, so the patch gets incorporated
into the original distribution.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
...and that is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030305163643.32f2844b.Alexander>