Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:51:41 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need a code review Message-ID: <86myjkbnky.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <489EDD2F.9080302@freebsd.org> (Oleksandr Tymoshenko's message of "Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:21:03 %2B0300") References: <20080729.161303.709402272.imp@bsdimp.com> <86r69buar0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <489B08F6.8060605@freebsd.org> <867iasfmrh.fsf@ds4.des.no> <489EDD2F.9080302@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org> writes: > Here is new fix: http://people.freebsd.org/~gonzo/mips2/libpam2.diff > The idea is to set define explicitly for dynamic case rather then rely > on __PIC__. This is completely backwards. Dynamic is the default option, and in fact the only supported option on many (non-FreeBSD) systems. If it were up to me, I would remove support for statically linked modules entirely. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86myjkbnky.fsf>