Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:03:38 +0100 From: Oliver Brandmueller <ob@e-Gitt.NET> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE -> -STABLE and size of / Message-ID: <20100126160338.GN3917@e-Gitt.NET> In-Reply-To: <20100124002054.BACFC1CC13@ptavv.es.net> References: <201001222220.31040.freebsd@insightbb.com> <20100124002054.BACFC1CC13@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:20:54PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Also, at the start of this thread, the OP said that he did a buildkernel > and a buildworld. This is broken and may produce a non-bootable > kernel. Always buildworld and then buildkernel so that the new toolchain > is used to build the kernel. (This also has nothing to do with the > original issue of the amount of space in the root partition being too > small for amd64 systems, but I am hoping to avoid future issues.) I did both in the right order (first buildworld, then buildkernel). The kernel was OK and bootable. I hd no problem, just experienced something that in my opinion violates POLA. buildworld + buildkernel + installkernel should not produce an error for a fresh default installation. I think we all agreee on that. You can try this easily with an amd64 8.0-RELEASE. - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller http://sysadm.in/ ob@sysadm.in | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100126160338.GN3917>