Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:35:15 +0200 From: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Message-ID: <20000329123514.B10653@cons.org> In-Reply-To: <92014.954325875@zippy.cdrom.com>; from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com on Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 02:31:15AM -0800 References: <20000329113951.A9935@cons.org> <92014.954325875@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <92014.954325875@zippy.cdrom.com>, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > I should also note that this has nothing whatsoever to do with CDROM > sales since I already told Walnut Creek CDROM awhile back that I would > not be doing a CDROM version of 3.5 - it will be a network-only > release. We have enough work just placing one line of CD products > into the market and the whole 2.2.8/3.x overlap was really difficult > to map onto our existing customer base. All customers will simply > receive 4.0, 4.1 .. 4.x. No 3.5 CDs in stores? That's all I want. Sorry, I didn't knew that. Still would prefer a 3.4* name for the network release, but that's not that important. Nontheless, I will take this as given and upgrade my last 3.x machine so that I can't do real testing on RELENG_3 anymore. Speaking of CDs, I saw that 4.0 will be a full release (not a snapshot-like CD), is that correct? Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000329123514.B10653>