Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 07:36:00 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS Message-ID: <199710061436.HAA00223@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Oct 2, 97 10:01:00 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Please, not again, don't duplicate the errors of your past handling > > of this. > > > > The sequence of commits should be something that creates > > > > 2.2-STABLE (where we are today) > > 2.2.5-BETA (for while we are in BETA on the branch) > > 2.2.5-RELEASE (when you finally roll the puppy up) > > 2.2.5-STABLE (after you roll the release). > > That would be totally and utterly bogus. And I suppose you'll replace my above ``2.2.5-STABLE'' with ``2.2-STABLE'', like that isn't totally bogus too! 2.2 < 2.2.5, thats going backwards, and makes it very hard to tell if this ``STABLE'' is post 2.2.1, post 2.2.2, or post 2.2.5! YOUR CONFUSING THE USERS, AND MY CLIENTS!!!! -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation, Inc. Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710061436.HAA00223>