Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 23:34:00 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <arch@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /rescue Message-ID: <20030509063400.GB16323@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030508.124451.109704557.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> <20030508.110858.91024289.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030508183612.GA56264@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030508.124451.109704557.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 12:44:51PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on > : > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree > : > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have > : > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that. > : > > : > NetBSD put them in /rescue. /stand has been phased out over the past > : > few years. There's precident many ways. > : > : How has it been phased out?? My 5.0-RELEASE install certainly has a > : /stand with the contents of: > > /stand never is updated after the initial install, so it slowly rots > away :-( and 'make world' can update it. Or will we have /resuce that is never updated by 'make world'?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030509063400.GB16323>