Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:23:48 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>, David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, sjh@zorak.net, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Clock running double time Message-ID: <76239.1048011828@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:22:07 PST." <20030318182207.C8DF95D07@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030318182207.C8DF95D07@ptavv.es.net>, "Kevin Oberman" writes: >> kern.timecounter.hardware=TSC > >Can someone explain why TSC is preferred to i8254 (or why not)? Cheaper access & better resolution. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?76239.1048011828>