Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:48:13 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: David Duchscher <daved@tamu.edu> Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: new CARP implementation Message-ID: <20110814084813.GA43567@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <5D7408D3-FAA1-4E22-A136-83DC75D47837@tamu.edu> References: <20110810160526.GO43567@FreeBSD.org> <5D7408D3-FAA1-4E22-A136-83DC75D47837@tamu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> My two cents. D> D> We rely on the arp load balance feature. We certainly don't find it useless. Looking at ip load balancing, it would also mean that we would no longer be able to grow bandwidth with additional systems since all boxes must receive all traffic. I only humbling ask that some sort of load balancing feature be included when this goes live. Ok, I will make effort to support it. I will inform when patch would be updated. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110814084813.GA43567>