Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 20:48:45 +0800 From: Khairil Yusof <kaeru@pd.jaring.my> To: James Pole <james@pole.net.nz> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/58840: [PATCH] exclude possibly unrequireddependenciesfrom x11/gnome2 Message-ID: <1067863725.16977.59.camel@wolverine.home.net> In-Reply-To: <1067844519.16977.18.camel@wolverine.home.net> References: <200311021927.hA2JRIt2074978@freefall.freebsd.org> <1067833233.258.10.camel@localhost> <20031103045730.GV96543@toxic.magnesium.net> <1067843548.3865.17.camel@localhost> <1067844519.16977.18.camel@wolverine.home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-rSNCfMNoGdvzrYjrpe1x Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 15:28, Khairil Yusof wrote: > Why do you need options for this? Apologies if my email sounded offencive. I read what I wrote again. It may have come across as rude (in the context of an email). It wasn't my intention, should have put a smiley in there somewhere. A good point as is being discussed is, not a whole bunch of ifdefs but a nice ncurses based screen like that of php4. I still however agree that the gnome2 meta-port should stick with the gnome project specs, and that it is trivial to remove unwanted ports from the meta-port. -- "Optimized, readable, on time; Pick any two."=20 FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT i386=20 8:29PM up 1 day, 21:14, 2 users, load averages: 0.38, 0.41, 0.32 --=-rSNCfMNoGdvzrYjrpe1x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/pk6sDAqnLW/+/X8RAijcAJ0bE7ApMPvNodlaQlmNbwOTNOpE0ACg+IOD etjL4qpxiVdVoq4Wldq+oUw= =CSjG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rSNCfMNoGdvzrYjrpe1x--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1067863725.16977.59.camel>