Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Dec 2014 07:44:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 196248] net/libsrtp: Upgrade to latest from GitHub
Message-ID:  <bug-196248-13-O2sDtvXLq7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196248-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-196248-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196248

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|net/libsrtp - upgrade to    |net/libsrtp: Upgrade to
                   |latest from GitHub [patch]  |latest from GitHub
           Keywords|                            |needs-qa, patch

--- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
Switching from an x.y.z (1.4.4) version to YYYYMMDD (20141224) is likely to
cause issues if and when the version convention needs to be switched back in
future.

The upstream GitHub repository has a v1.5.0 [1] tag which you can use instead.

If there are later versions that haven't been tagged, request all release tags
to be created in the repository.

[1] https://github.com/cisco/libsrtp/tree/v1.5.0

Also:

 - GH_PROJECT now (recently) defaults to ${PORTNAME}
 - ${ORIGNAME} should no longer be necessary after the switch to GitHub
 - Should you provide OPTIONS for syslog, openssl, and generic-aesicm CONFIGURE
options?
 - test runtest check regression-test is overkill, regression-test: is enough
 - Does the upstream Makefile contain a check: target? Use that for
regression-test instead of runtest directly

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-196248-13-O2sDtvXLq7>