Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:46:09 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review Message-ID: <20030216114609.GE99812@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <xzpel68fpbo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030216105605.GA99732@nagual.pp.ru> <5014.1045393137@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030216110725.GA99812@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpel68fpbo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:16:27 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > My message <xzpof5dm7jg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> dated 2003-02-16 > 00:46:27 CET contained all the information you needed. If you mean that quote from it: "This behaviour was very surprising to people who wanted to prevent OPIE users from using their passwords even locally." The answer was obvious - such people should read OPIE documentation to not be so surprised. I don't think that people who not read docs is "information I need". > Do you really think that your hysterical reaction, bombarding me with > message upon incriminatory message and completely ignoring what I say I not bombarding you, I answer sequentally on each message and many of them comes when I write answer. About ignoring, I see situation, like you ignore me. BTW, do you ever think that "bombarding" and "ignoring" terms can't co-exist, they are oppisite? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030216114609.GE99812>