Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 04:32:44 +0200 From: Chargen <chargen@gmail.com> To: Mohammed Farrag <mfarrag@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I need reply in Embedded FreeBSD Kernel Theme Message-ID: <AANLkTimqAu_qfHzsIxIGfZGYr02c-bGvz39ZEYQ5nXbl@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinnItLnAn5MerKziHNxCJrr4z7P0GFJQOJbgm4m@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinnItLnAn5MerKziHNxCJrr4z7P0GFJQOJbgm4m@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sir, first of all: I'm no expert in this field but I've seen your document and I'm still wondering why you should impose such a design. I suppose it's well thought of but still I'm a bit opposed to binary configuration files because I think has to be some kind of dependency on how to generate these kind of files (correct me if I'm wrong?) as far as your document goes: "We will unload all the drivers that indicated with zeros in the module metadata file. That would make the OS to be a few of Megabytes." unload? what is the logic here? I'm sorry but what is the real gain here, can you please elaborate? On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 03:17, Mohammed Farrag <mfarrag@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi, > I hope that I could get some comments or suggestions about the work I did > in developing a new Embedded FreeBSD Kernel Theme. I will be glad to see > your replies. > download the work file from here > http://www.4shared.com/document/U237Abgs/description.html > With best wishes, > Mohammed Farrag > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimqAu_qfHzsIxIGfZGYr02c-bGvz39ZEYQ5nXbl>