Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:12:34 -0500
From:      Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, rnoland@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade
Message-ID:  <E1LT0fC-0001ui-EP@daland.home>
In-Reply-To: <20090130195311.GK1755@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> (message from Peter Jeremy on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:53:11 %2B1100)
References:  <6B7ABE80-35AB-4C44-B5A4-200E10DCC3AC@airwired.net> <E1LSP0B-0003Ds-H8@daland.home> <49819BD5.5040709@FreeBSD.org> <E1LSWHr-0009TS-P7@daland.home> <1233236412.1779.40.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <20090130195311.GK1755@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
,--- You/Peter (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:53:11 +1100) ----*
| X11 is a critical component for anyone who is using FreeBSD as a
| desktop and having upgrades fail or come with significant POLA
| violations and regressions for significant numbers of people is not
| acceptable.

Fully agree with this.

| I suggest that this approach needs to be followed for every future
| release of X.org until (if) the X.org Project demonstrates that they
| can provide release-quality code.

And agree with this, as far as the future is concerned -- but this
leaves out the issue of what is going to be done for people whose
systems became practically incapacitated in a matter of one day.

Screw us?

I realize that personally I haven't contributed much (hey, a simple
port's maintainer!) to FreeBSD, so a disregard to my situation may be
well deserved.  But "you" (whoever this "you" is: the "ports manager",
the X port maintainers) have to be aware that leaving the things in
the state they are now, you are screwing somebody.

| >  This update also brings in support for a lot of people who are
| >running newer hardware.
| 
| And breaks support for lots of people who used to have functional X
| servers.

Just so.

,--- Kostik Belousov (Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:25:09 +0200) ----*
| Just to give a different view on *this* update. I have exactly opposing
| experience.
| 
| So far 1.5.3 + updated DRM works good on all my Radeons.
| And, I did not have a problem with i945GM on 1.4.2 and 1.5.3.
`----------------------------------------------------------*

Well, glad for you -- meanwhile I will be reverting my desktop to the
old X this weekend: the garbage on the screen is ugly, but the fact
that in the new X "opera" can grab a pointer for about a minute makes
the combined use of the browser and xterms/Emacses plain intolerable.

After I do this, as I did with my laptop already, I think I am
completely cut off from the ports automated upgrade cycle.

-- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net --





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1LT0fC-0001ui-EP>