Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 21:02:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to boot on K6/2 Message-ID: <20000321210201.B81118@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003211631260.50553-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>; from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu on Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 04:32:35PM -0800 References: <38D71C22.62A29CCE@cybercable.fr> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003211631260.50553-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 04:32:35PM -0800, Doug White wrote: > I would be in favor of renaming the boot.flp to something obviously > different, like 288boot.flp, to untrain us 2.x heads that got used to the Great idea. Would you be able to make the changes locally and test a `make release'? Then all we need to do is pass the patch pass JKH. (harder to say "NO" to working code) -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000321210201.B81118>