Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Jan 2001 10:49:29 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" <drwilco@drwilco.nl>
Cc:        Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: status of bridge code
Message-ID:  <3A707539.60091940@elischer.org>
References:  <4.3.2.7.0.20010124185058.00ac5100@mail.drwilco.net> <4.3.2.7.0.20010125000221.00b07d60@mail.bsdchicks.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" wrote:
> 
> >personally I use the netgraph bridging code and I think (though I'm biased)
> >that you should look at using htat rather than the hardwired bridging
> >code that it was derived from.
> 
> Now that I've read up on it I can tell you you and and Archie have every
> right to be biased =)
> 
> I've had a netgraph bridge in place for a while now and it works very well.
> (On 4.X-STABLE, on 5.X-CURRENT it went kablooie. See panic trace)

where is it?
(have you tried it REALLY recently?)

> 
> > > item on my list. Being an allround good networking OS this is unacceptable
> > > IMHO.
> >
> >Have a look at what you can do with netgraph first.
> >
> >Most people don't know what it is but it allows almost arbitrarily
> >complicated network topologies to be set up from the command line.
> 
> What you might want to tell people is that it allows networking structures
> to be setup in a simple manner, but is so powerful it can also be used for
> immensely complex structures. A friend and fellow BSD user of mine's first
> response was "I like to keep things simple". After I rephrased into the
> above he was much more interested.
> 
> But from my list of wishes I'd say the first 3 are gone. All that's left is
> spanning tree. I'm probably going to need this pretty soon, so once more
> I'm asking if anyone is working on it. If not I'll start on it.
> 
> Also, a quick question for you netgraph guys. Why is it that ng_one2many
> send a packet only out of one hook? I can see use for an algorithm that
> sends packets from the 'one' hook to all the 'many' hooks (that are up) and
> keep the normal behaviour for many to one.
> 
>          DocWilco


-- 
      __--_|\  Julian Elischer
     /       \ julian@elischer.org
    (   OZ    ) World tour 2000
---> X_.---._/  from Perth, presently in:  Budapest
            v


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A707539.60091940>