Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 13:49:20 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth), hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re(2): Standard Shipping Containers - A Proposal for Distributing FreeBSD Message-ID: <199605171949.NAA28434@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199605171908.NAA10080@rover.village.org> References: <199605171908.NAA10080@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : What could be simpler? ctm is fine for people who want read-only > : source, and are willing to carry it all. sup is much better for people > : who like to tinker with their tree. > > Hmmm, with the CVS tree I can have a limited set of uncommitted > chanages and cvs update handles the merging. Sup doesn't do this too > well... Huh? SUP is a distribution mechanism. You can 'SUP' the repository as easily as you can 'CTM' the repository, and CVS will handle the updates just as easily. :) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605171949.NAA28434>