Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Jul 1999 13:23:16 -0400
From:      Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com>
To:        "FreeBSD Questions (E-mail)" <questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   RE: procmail or .forward for "vacation" program.
Message-ID:  <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105AEB@site2s1>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK, given the comments I've gotten so far, how does this sound?

---------------------------------------------
:0:
* !^Precedence:.bulk
| "/usr/bin/vacation -a cjm2"
$ORGMAIL
---------------------------------------------

-Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Christopher Michaels [SMTP:ChrisMic@clientlogic.com]
> Sent:	Sunday, July 25, 1999 1:13 PM
> To:	'Mark Thomas'
> Cc:	FreeBSD Questions (E-mail)
> Subject:	RE: procmail or .forward for "vacation" program.
> 
> 	See below.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Mark Thomas [SMTP:thomas@clark.net]
> > Sent:	Sunday, July 25, 1999 1:11 PM
> > To:	Christopher Michaels
> > Subject:	RE: procmail or .forward for "vacation" program.
> > 
> > At 12:37 PM 7/25/99 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Ok, I should just stop sending e-mail today.  I think I'm getting antsy
> > >since I'm one day away from vacation.  I did a bit more reading of man
> > >pages, and hopefully someone can tell me if I'm on the right track.
> > >
> > >I have several rules that filter out the FreeBSD mailing list and some
> > other
> > >things by (if memory serves I'm not at home) the sender line in the
> > header.
> > >It then (of course) delivers it to a file in my ~/mail/ dir.
> > >
> > >Now, according to "man procmailrc" when a delivering rule is processed,
> > >subsequent rules are not processed.  Given than, is it safe to put the
> > >following at the end of my .procmailrc?
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------
> > >:0 c:
> > >| "/usr/bin/vacation -a cjm2"
> > >---------------------------------------------
> > >
> > 
> > This should work. You probably want to short circuit any mailer messages
> > by
> > putting a rule near the top of your .procmailrc like this:
> > 
> > :0:
> > * ^FROM_DAEMON
> > $ORIGMAIL
> > 
> 	Thanks, I didn't think of that!
> 
> 	Ok, given this, should I maybe make my rule instead say the
> following, or does it not matter since it's the last rule in the file?
> 	---------------------------------------------
> 	:0:
> 	| "/usr/bin/vacation -a cjm2"
> 	$ORGMAIL
> 	---------------------------------------------
> 
> > Which delivers daemon generated mail to your normal mailbox.
> > 
> > If you do a lot of procmail stuff, using X-Loop headers to short circuit
> > mail loops is a good thing too.
> > 
> 	I really just use it to dump my mailing lists, and cron output,
> etc.. into different folders, but that's definitely a good idea.  If I
> read
> properly, vacation is smart enough not to get into any loops, isn't it?
> 
> 	Again thanks!
> 
> > Mark
> > ---
> > thomas@clark.net ---> http://www.clark.net/pub/thomas
> > PBEM Eldritch --------> http://www.pmpro.com/eldritch
> > [TM4463-ORG]
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105AEB>