Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 12:17:07 -0600 From: John E Hein <jhein@timing.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, ports@freebsd.org, Ganael LAPLANCHE <ganael.laplanche@martymac.com>, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_LINUX_RPM and PORTDOCS Message-ID: <18488.23459.464314.727238@gromit.timing.com> In-Reply-To: <20080524193545.0167e8a4@deskjail> References: <20080524073145.M76509@martymac.com> <07923414@ipt.ru> <20080524150909.M12444@martymac.com> <20080524160433.M17651@martymac.com> <15111974@ipt.ru> <20080524193545.0167e8a4@deskjail>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger wrote at 19:35 +0200 on May 24, 2008: > Removing unwanted stuff in post-extract is not uncommon. I don't think > a patch for linux-rpm.mk with something like this would be a bad > solution. Removing things in post-extract _should_ be uncommon. If I want to look at the extraction of the distfile(s), running 'make extract' should give me that without removing things. I think I've heard others echo that sentiment. Why not pre- or post-patch - part of a stage that implies a modification of unpacked distfile(s)?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18488.23459.464314.727238>