Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:20:32 -0600 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: vova@fbsd.ru Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does GNOME 2.9.x in MarcusCom treats you so far? Message-ID: <opsmvm0ig79aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <opsmunkkey9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <opsmr0hvtp9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1109419564.1942.10.camel@localhost> <opsmtidaa29aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1109445790.1942.32.camel@localhost> <opsmtmltx19aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1109490309.2370.5.camel@localhost> <opsmunkkey9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:34:58 -0600, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:45:09 +0300, Vladimir Grebenschikov > <vova@fbsd.ru> wrote: > <snip> >> Looks like they do not add any extension to icon name: >> >> % grep Icon /usr/local/share/applications/kde/KMail.desktop > > Insteresting.... I will have to check in my local machine for > share/applications/kde... It might be easy fix, I will check it tomorrow. After the more check up with marcus, we agree that there is no way for us can do with that. There are a lot of icons that aren't working, because of GNOME is not in KDE's theme. For example, kmail is in Locolor, crystalsvg, kdeclassic and slick that GNOME doesn't have. Anything images that are in hicolor or the root of the icons directory will working fine. For example, kturtle and quanta work fine because their images are in hicolor. Cheers, Mezz > Cheers, > Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opsmvm0ig79aq2h7>