Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:57:14 +1000 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: devel/linux_devtools question Message-ID: <20040710075714.GA85896@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <200407100935.08310.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20040709172523.GA64473@ozzmosis.com> <200407100837.37392.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20040710071028.GA85310@ozzmosis.com> <200407100935.08310.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 09:35:00AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > Without errno.h you can't even build many ISO C programs. :) > > That's a different errno.h though - it is located in the toplevel include dir > (/usr/include/errno.h), it's a standard libc header. linux/errno.h on the > other hand is a kernel specific header. Yes, but clearly /usr/include/errno.h requires /usr/include/bits/errno.h which requires /usr/include/linux/errno.h. ... and for those playing at home, /usr/include/linux/errno.h requires /usr/include/linux/asm/errno.h, where /usr/include/linux/asm is a symlink to /usr/include/linux/asm-i386. For the Linux 2.2.26 kernel, anyway. Phew. ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040710075714.GA85896>