Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:42:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: TM4525@aol.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows Message-ID: <200410251642.i9PGg4v24177@clunix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <96.186ca920.2eae82f1@aol.com> from "TM4525@aol.com" at Oct 25, 2004 12:25:21 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > In a message dated 10/25/04 11:48:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > nomadlogic@gmail.com writes: > > There's also less documentation, fewer resources, etc. So its more difficult > > to be proficient in unix than in windows. > > > >what are you talking about "less documentation" for Unix?!? What > >"Unix" are you referring to...Solaris...HPUX..AIX...BSD? I'm sorry to > >bite on this flame bait but i've been tracking your posts for some > >time now and I really don't understand where you get these ideas from? > Let's see. The mailing list is "freebsd-questions". Hmmm. I wonder. > > Perhaps the word "logic" in your domain name needs tweaking? Sounding really like a troll now. Personal attacks are not welcome. In general, I find UNIX of almost any variety to be better documented that MS and such open source systems as FreeBSD suplement documentation by making the source fully available to the user to examine. ////jerry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410251642.i9PGg4v24177>