Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:03:22 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov@gmail.com>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Question about socket timeouts
Message-ID:  <201308291203.23055.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201308261505.06342.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <CAKGHGPS=HCYfXxPXuUz5G83j5sGieejPU-QHmi9TrmMhmweHLw@mail.gmail.com> <CACYV=-F1rahCJYrk5NB%2BEedgA1Ebud-jX-UNyx6pC3OrTU%2Bung@mail.gmail.com> <201308261505.06342.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:05:06 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:23:44 pm Davide Italiano wrote:
> > Please consider the following patch:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/review/socket_timeout.diff
> > I've tested it and it works OK. I got a timeout which is ~= 25ms using
> > the testcase provided by the user.
> > The only doubt I have is about the range check, I've changed a bit
> > because the 'integer' part of sbintime_t fits in 32-bits, but I'm not
> > sure it's the best way of doing this.
> 
> Nice!  Bruce actually wants me to adjust the range check a bit (which will
> fit in well with your changes I think).  Please let me get that fix in
> (so it can be part of the future MFC) and then you can commit this.  Thanks!
> 
> Actually, I think you still need to patch the sogetopt() case to work correctly
> (it is still doing a manual conversion from 'val' to a timeval assuming it is
> in 'hz' units).

I'm done with my range check changes, please move forward with your change
(though make sure you fix the sogetsockopt() case please).

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201308291203.23055.jhb>