Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:23 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> To: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org> Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: (void)0 instead of empty defines Message-ID: <20090615195422.GB1418@lizard.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <4A369529.5090004@freebsd.org> References: <20090615181555.GA52009@freebsd.org> <4A369529.5090004@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:38:33AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > > Are you saying that: > > if (cond) > ; > > is considered worthy of a warning by the compiler? Is it just "if" or all > conditional control constructs (e.g. while)? > > I can image many instances of this construct arising from debugging > facilities. This sounds like a stupid restriction and I would argue we > should just disable the warning. GCC warns too with -Wextra.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090615195422.GB1418>