Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 12:13:18 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS DOWN Message-ID: <f26oc6$6nc$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070513090913.GA70647@samodelkin.net> References: <20070512153532.GQ21795@elvis.mu.org> <63984.1178992555@critter.freebsd.dk> <f25m78$ik$2@sea.gmane.org> <20070513090913.GA70647@samodelkin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4620C3B6F6DE5BB5E8787EBB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Max Khon wrote: > Hi! >=20 > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 02:30:29AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Just a data point: many people were turned away from FreeBSD because a= >> few PHP releases did a double-free or malloc-inside-signal-handler >> calls. Yes, GNU's malloc should have been stricter, but it's not funny= >> when your apache crashes with SIGABORT. >=20 > That's not a valid argument. PHP developers hate apache2 and threads. S= o what? It's not a technically important argument, but nowadays if PHP doesn't work on FreeBSD, it's considered to be FreeBSD's fault... (the "millions of flies can't be wrong" argument). (Just saying that it's not very useful to be overly strict). --------------enig4620C3B6F6DE5BB5E8787EBB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGRuTEldnAQVacBcgRAv76AJsEZAqmFg+FddoJFy7h4s5EVyjQWQCg8Gpx BEXsbA3d79OkRMLVRH+5Kn0= =/N9R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4620C3B6F6DE5BB5E8787EBB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f26oc6$6nc$1>