Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:58:19 -0300 (EST) From: Luiz Morte da Costa Junior <morte@correionet.com.br> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> Cc: Pete Mckenna <pmckenna@uswest.net>, Kevin Lynn <klynn@santacruz.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: L440GX+ Server Board Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909021356540.32420-100000@caxton.correionet.com.br> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909011627050.66968-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). > > The bus that the onboard NIC is on probably gets probed later then > then the expansion bus. I'm using only the onboard NIC. I didn't add any other NIC in my server. []s, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Analista de Redes E-mail: morte@correionet.com.br Telefone: +55 19 754-2532 Fax: +55 19 255-7576 CorreioNet - Correio Popular Campinas - SP - Brazil To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909021356540.32420-100000>