Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 22:55:14 -0400 From: "David Stanford" <dthomas53@gmail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Questions on Porting Message-ID: <f2c91f770606111955p726d0e35ie23bde88d58e9abd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello all, I'm currently attempting to create my first port (for SSL-Explorer<http://3sp.com/showSslExplorer.do>) and wanted to make sure I was on the right track before continuing any further. First, I'd like to know if anyone else has begun this already as I wouldn't want to continue on duplicating the effort. If anyone has already begun this, please let me know. My second question is one concerning best practices for porting software such as this that requires user interaction during the build and installation. Basically, to install this (java-based) software you need to build it using ant (devel/apache-ant) which doesn't just build, but actually opens up a TCP port and has you browse to it via HTTP and create the initial configuration through a web interface. So my question is should something like this be ported in a way that it merely installs the source into, say, ${LOCAL_BASE} and then just prints pkg-message with brief installation directions, or should it actually be built during "make install"? I ask because I would think the latter is a security concern to anyone who hasn't used the port before and may not be keeping an eye on the build. Any and all comments appreciated! -David P.S. I'm sure I'll have a few more questions once this one's out of the way. ;) -- [root@fbsd ~]# fortune Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f2c91f770606111955p726d0e35ie23bde88d58e9abd>