Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:28:36 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.ru> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa isa.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970325170701.722B-100000@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199703250350.OAA09832@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Mar 1997, Bruce Evans wrote: > Are you going to fix config/drivers to generate/check -1/-2. I think > config generates too many -1 's now for the above change to be useful. Config historycally generates -1 for "port auto" or "port?" and -2 for "port none" it not generates this values for other cases, so where you find too many of them? I don't thin this values require any checking, they control mainly diagnostic printout form and maybe conflicts. The reason of fix was that I tired of kernel output lines like: sbxvi0 at 0x0 ... (I don't have SB16 at port 0 :-) When I add "port?" to sbxvi0 line (really it is autoconfigured from sb0 address) I see even worse variant: sbxvi0 at 0xffffffff ... After my fixes it finally prints: sbxvi0 at ? ... (maybe change "?" to "auto" here? What fo you think?) -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970325170701.722B-100000>