Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:12:54 -0500
From:      "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To:        Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset
Message-ID:  <4794E0A6.1070206@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4794C484.9010005@grasslake.net>
References:  <47928642.2090707@gmail.com>	<4792A17E.9060208@hdk5.net>	<4792B383.6010406@gmail.com>	<20080120105540.GB22192@cicely12.cicely.de> <4794C484.9010005@grasslake.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> Bernd Walter wrote:
>> Realtek has two devices for Gbit PCI: the 8169 and the reduced 8110.
>> They are both more or less the same - likely even the same chip
>> inside,
>> but the later has pins reduced.
>> AFAIK the later can't have an external PHY, which you can't have
>> anyway
>> if there is neither a connector or PHY itself connected on the board.
>> The 8168 is the successor for PCI express, with the 8111 being the new
>> reduced variant.
>> Both PCIe are detected but didn't run stable with our re(4), but it is
>> said that the latest driver fixes this and also adds a good speed
>> improvement
> I bought an 8169 based card due to time and local availability
> issues and the re(4) driver sucked it hard in 6.3 and the card
> wasn't stable.  I ended up with an Intel card which works fine.
>
> I've noticed that re(4) has recently been overhauled extensively (as
> in the last week), will these changes ever get merged back into
> 6_STABLE, or do they depend on changes only present in 7.X onward?
>
> For $20, its barely worth my time to run the thing back to the store
> and recent SWMBO de-cluttering regulations require it to be used or
> tossed.

Pyun says that the patches should work on any 6.3+ set up... I am
running 8-current (amd64) and the performance is almost equal to the
vendor supplied driver for vista now (if not the same or a little better)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHlOCmQi2hk2LEXBARAramAJ4tpR34HOoWc54S5X6oG49jzZzJYwCfV/ec
KgLnHA9ujWiSLB15b1tDdbs=
=wt4w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4794E0A6.1070206>