Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Oct 1998 10:25:39 -0500 (EST)
From:      Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: scanf in the kernel?
Message-ID:  <Pine.HPP.3.96.981030102422.27452F-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810300813.AAA01726@dingo.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Mike Smith wrote:

> Just wondering what the general feeling would be about having scanf in 
> the kernel?  As we move towards more abstract representations of things 
> (eg. device names), it's becoming more important to be able to parse 
> strings inside the kernel.

I'm not a kernel-hacking kind of guy, but I know just from personal C
experiences that scanf makes things a lot easier to change later on and
easier to get a visual representation of. scanf and sprintf have become my
friend.

- bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp -
-  ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560  -

	"Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect 
	when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.HPP.3.96.981030102422.27452F-100000>