Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:46:29 -0500 From: Mike Patterson <mpatters@cs.uwaterloo.ca> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml Message-ID: <3FD3E605.5040306@cs.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <1070843957.78821.13.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> <3FD3C69A.3090501@cs.uwaterloo.ca> <1070843957.78821.13.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > V po, 08. 12. 2003 v 01:32, Mike Patterson píše: >>Not that it really matters to me, but if somebody contributes a port and >>then drops it, and somebody else takes it over, why should that somebody >>else not get credit for that, if credit is to be assigned? Maintaining >>is just as important as the original submission, no? > > > I misunderstood your point. I was under impression you only want to > complete the list by adding missing entries under current "rules" [1]. Well, it wasn't my point, I was just responding to your response to somebody else. :-) > If you're about to add all authors *and* maintainers than it's > completely different question. I don't see why that should not be done, and that's what I thought was being discussed, although I could be wrong - it's been known to happen. :) Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FD3E605.5040306>