Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:09:09 +0200
From:      Pierre Guinoiseau <geekounet@poildetroll.net>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Vimage vs. jails
Message-ID:  <4A8B3495.7010304@poildetroll.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A8B30D5.9000400@elischer.org>
References:  <20090818215721.23230@gmx.net> <4A8B30D5.9000400@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig2698E08DAE7FCB8086E148D3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Julian Elischer wrote:
> it's not Vimage vs Jails
> but
> Vimage as part of Jails.
>=20
>=20
> Peter Cornelius wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I just see the vimage changes going into RELENG_8 and I now am
>> getting my hands dirty, finally. So thanks to all involved.
>>
>> Just to get my head around this the right way, I understand that
>> there is no plan to merge vimage and jail into a single jail
>> utility, right?
>=20
> Actually it IS now all one utility...
> Add the 'vnet' option to jail to get it to create a new vnet withthe
> jail, otherwise it acts as before.
>=20
>>
>> I may want a large number of vimages "w/o" jails, or at least a
>> number of jails "inside" a couple of vimages (reason being the
>> default route issue raised a while ago).
>=20
> can you expand on that?
>=20
> example comand lines include:
> jail -c host.hostname=3Dtest path=3D/ vnet command=3D/bin/tcsh
> ( make a jail with the same root as normal but with a separate
> network stack.)
>=20
>=20
> jail -c host.hostname=3Dtest path=3D/ vnet children.max=3D4 \
>            command=3D/bin/tcsh
> (same as above, excep the jail made is in turn able to make
> up to 4 child jails
>=20

BTW, when will we be able to set those new parameters in rc.conf? The
current jails rc script still uses the old way for setting up (or maybe
did I missed something?), so it doesn't allow to add those new
parameters. :( It may be a desirable feature for 8.0-RELEASE I think.

>=20
>>
>> Thanks again, and
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Peter.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> PS. I see a couple of lock order reversals on RELENG_8 which I
>> would like to report if the build currently running did not address
>> them -- do we prefer them to a mailing list or to gnats?
>=20



--------------enig2698E08DAE7FCB8086E148D3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqLNJUACgkQJikNJSAyef+y7gCg0FhigABWk9l95l3JXLdk/dpg
L/0An0S9zWVdpidmRIUboAzUC+edeMSM
=SIPB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig2698E08DAE7FCB8086E148D3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A8B3495.7010304>