Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 09:17:18 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timeout granularity (was: Re: Console driver...) Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980702091557.1008D-100000@terra> In-Reply-To: <199807021127.NAA12406@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Jul 1998, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > polling if the test is successful. Sooner or later hopefully we > will move to large values of HZ anyways. good point. I've experimented with HZ of 10,000 on a 486-25. 10K was a bit large for this machine, but 2500 was no problem. What's the largest HZ anyone out there has used? I'd expect that 10K or 20K would not be a real problem. Anyone know? ron p.s. no, time did not run fast. I put pre-scaling in hardclock so all was well. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.980702091557.1008D-100000>