Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 16:15:38 +0900 From: Kimura Fuyuki <fuyuki@hadaly.org> To: "."@babolo.ru Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/50444: Suggestion for new category: "dns" Message-ID: <868yuug02t.wl%fuyuki@hadaly.org> In-Reply-To: <1049173014.771256.2049.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> References: <200303310510.h2V5A4UX009038@freefall.freebsd.org> <1049173014.771256.2049.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:56:54 +0400 (MSD), "."@babolo.ru wrote: > My ports/38593 > There is not strict check on second level. I don't have any reason to oppose the sub-categorization of the ports tree, but this is very old problem and perhaps multiple plans have been proposed and discarded. You must persuade the tough port-managers by very concrete plan and many-many-actually-working patches. One of such debates: (I couldn't find more recent one.) http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=388130+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-ports/20000109.freebsd-ports We must live today. net/ and devel/ are dying from being overweight. > Oh, sysutils/portupgrade... it is out of my interests. I love portupgrade.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868yuug02t.wl%fuyuki>