Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:08:07 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c src/sys/sys socket.h Message-ID: <20000615120807.M18462@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200006151845.MAA25472@nomad.yogotech.com>; from nate@yogotech.com on Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 12:45:08PM -0600 References: <200006151818.LAA31278@freefall.freebsd.org> <200006151845.MAA25472@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> [000615 11:46] wrote: > > alfred 2000/06/15 11:18:43 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_socket2.c > > sys/sys socket.h > > Log: > > add socketoptions DELAYACCEPT and HTTPACCEPT which will not allow an accept() > > until the incoming connection has either data waiting or what looks like a > > HTTP request header already in the socketbuffer. This ought to reduce > > the context switch time and overhead for processing requests. > > > > The initial idea and code for HTTPACCEPT came from Yahoo engineers and has > > been cleaned up and a more lightweight DELAYACCEPT for non-http servers > > has been added > > > > Reviewed by: silence on hackers. > > Huh? I never saw this. I object to adding application specific code > inside the kernel. It's not really a signifigant amount of code if you look at the delta, the performance difference is signifigant though. You'll be happy when I release my http server that uses this. The final patch is up at: http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/kblob/kblob-final.diff Here is the original message titled: "big patch"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000615120807.M18462>