Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:18:25 +0100 From: Stefan Farfeleder <stefan@fafoe.narf.at> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.osreldate and EAI_NODATA deprecation Message-ID: <20031231141546.GC595@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> In-Reply-To: <200312311441.23719.max@love2party.net> References: <20031231130800.GB59239@eeyore.local.dohd.org> <200312311421.25383.max@love2party.net> <20031231132651.GC59239@eeyore.local.dohd.org> <200312311441.23719.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:41:23PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: > On Wednesday 31 December 2003 14:26, Mark Huizer wrote: > > > > Well, that's tougher, since EAI_NODATA is defined (it's defined to be > > EAI_NODATA). > > Hmm... > > would this work? I'm not too 100% secure about preprocessing stuff. > > If this should work, I could try to get it included in the normal kaffe > > tree. > > > > #if defined(EAI_NODATA) && EAI_NODATA != EAI_NONAME > > ... > > #endif > > Other question, does it hurt you that EAI_NODATA == EAI_NONAME? I'd not think > so ... so why borther?! But yes, the syntax is okay ... consider extra > parentheses for the second expression. Eg. it does matter if both macros occur in case labels of a switch statement. Regards, Stefan Farfeleder
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031231141546.GC595>