Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:53:16 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Erik Trulsson" <ertr1013@student.uu.se> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Jason J. Hellenthal" <jasonh@dataix.net> Subject: Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys" Message-ID: <op.uxycfqw59aq2h7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20090731173636.GA76357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20090731121249.538ea7e7.jasonh@DataIX.net> <20090731173636.GA76357@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:36:36 -0500, Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:12:49PM -0400, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: >> >> Now that I have finally upgraded my system in full from the last mix-up >> with jpeg, You guys have bumped up every PORTREVISION that depends on >> jpeg >> "Great real great" Now I get to spend another three days fixing up some >> more packages and rebuilding about 800+ ports. >> >> Thanks a whole lot. > > Nobody is forcing you to rebuild your ports just because the PORTREVISION > was bumped. If everything works fine for you there is actually no good > reason at all to do so. Yes, but how can you tell if there is newer version? The pkg_version and pkgversion don't tell you that it's PORTREVISION or actually newer version. What about when we run 'port* -a'? Took about two weeks to get PORTREVISION bump isn't right at all. Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.uxycfqw59aq2h7>