Date: 06 Nov 1997 01:05:46 +0100 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD shines..[Fwd: Re: semaphore speed] Message-ID: <xzpaffidgyt.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "John S. Dyson"'s message of Wed, 5 Nov 1997 17:06:17 -0500 (EST) References: <199711052206.RAA08809@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> writes: > Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav said: > > > [long discussion about benchmark results in Linux/FreeBSD deleted] > > > [Tons of boring and meaningless benchmark results deleted] > > Has it occurred to any of you that your benchmark results are > > irrelevant unless you run the Linux and FreeBSD benchmark on the > Most of the discussion is associated with the differences in perf between > FreeBSD kernels. Frankly, I don't think that the FreeBSD-current and My apologies. I read some of the thread and seemed to understand that people were gloating over the fact that Linux was somewhat slower than FreeBSD, although the results had been gathered by different people on different machines. -- * Finrod (INTJ) * Unix weenie * dag-erli@ifi.uio.no * cellular +47-92835919 * RFC1123: "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpaffidgyt.fsf>