Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 11:33:14 -0400 From: "Troy Settle" <troy@picus.com> To: "Ryugen C. Fisher" <Ryugen@palaver.org>, "Dan Harnett" <danh@wzrd.com> Cc: "Corey Ralph" <corey@net-tech.com.au>, <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Using radius to NT server? Message-ID: <NIEBLEDADLBOBAJFKPHDGEFKCAAA.troy@picus.com> In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20000531101912.00a98a10@mail.palaver.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
** IIRC the port 1645 for Radius is the port that is used by Livingston for ** there Portmaster Routers, etc. Livingston (now a div of AT&T) is Livingston was borged by Lucent, not AT&T. Lucent was spun from AT&T after the breakup (IIRC). ** the shop ** where Radius was first drafted, written and implemented. As a ** result most ** "older" radius software and hardware use the 1645 port... I ** have not read ** the RFC and would frankly be curious as to how the port got changed from ** the "factory' spec to port 1812. Livingston used 1645/1646 because they thought those ports were availiable. In reality, those ports were reserved for some obscure service. When the IETF(?) got ahold of the Radius RFC, they found a pair of ports more suitable for the application. 1812/1813. -Troy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NIEBLEDADLBOBAJFKPHDGEFKCAAA.troy>