Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Aug 2013 11:01:37 +0200
From:      Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org>
To:        python@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] lang/python becoming a python binary wrapper
Message-ID:  <20130817090137.GB40195@medusa.sysfault.org>
In-Reply-To: <520F36D2.5090608@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20130802180059.GA1278@medusa.sysfault.org> <20130803123634.GA1280@medusa.sysfault.org> <20130803123914.GB1280@medusa.sysfault.org> <20130810084638.GB1282@medusa.sysfault.org> <20130815181747.GA1281@medusa.sysfault.org> <20130817081345.GA40195@medusa.sysfault.org> <520F36D2.5090608@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On, Sat Aug 17, 2013, Kubilay Kocak wrote:

> On 17/08/2013 6:13 PM, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > The relevant UPDATING entry for the change will look like:
> >
> > 20130817:
> >   AFFECTS: users of lang/python*
> >   AUTHOR: mva@FreeBSD.org
> >
> >   The lang/python* ports do not install links to 2to3, idle, pydoc, python
> >   and other binaries anymore. Those were moved into the lang/python2 and
> >   lang/python3 ports. If you have lang/python2* or lang/python3* installed,
> >   please also install the associated lang/python2 or lang/python3 port.
> >
> >   1. update lang/python2* and/or lang/python3*
> >   2. install lang/python2 and/or lang/python3
> >   3. reinstall lang/python (if installed).
> >
> >
> > I think, the instructions should suffice. Please let me know, if you
> > feel that more details are necessary.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Marcus
> >
>
> Minor tweak:
>
> The lang/python* ports no longer install links to 2to3, idle, pydoc,
> python and other binaries. These have been moved into lang/python2 and
> lang/python3 ports respectively. This change allows ... brief
> explanation of benefit here.
>
> Also, what are the "other" binaries, and are they worth mentioning
> explicitly?

They are not worth mentioning in my opinion, since those would be the
shared builds (python-shared) and config binaries (python-{shared}-config).

Right now I would not want to name any specific benefit, since this
could give users the wrong impression that it is available already and
something like

  This change allows the FreeBSD python ports to be used with different
  Python versions at the same time as a mid-term goal.

or

  This change will enable other Python implementations to act as default
  Python interpreter in the future.

feels to vague to me. If you think, it's worth mentioning, I'll put it
in, though.

Cheers
Marcus

--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlIPO/AACgkQi68/ErJnpkf7QwCePG7NmTGYyTdFDON32pomMoll
f5QAoMiyPtSEyxAS+7tr25VnY0k6I3OQ
=IZCt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0ntfKIWw70PvrIHh--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130817090137.GB40195>