Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:47:50 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de>, atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New version of ngATM Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030207134646.80673B-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20030207133658.H15295@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: :On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: :> For HARP users there is a harp pseudo-driver if_harp. This driver :> attaches to all ngATM interfaces in the system and creates a HARP :> physical interface for each ngATM interface (using the same name - the :> interfaces are in different name spaces). It is then possible to use all :> HARP stuff over these interfaces. : :Fantastic. How would people compare the current ngATM and current HARP stacks? Is it worth at all to fully port the HARP driver code to the ngATM code and just waste the netatm/ code? Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030207134646.80673B-100000>