Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 22:00:26 -0700 (PDT) From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/51910: ucom0 should be generated by MAKEDEV all Message-ID: <200305070500.h4750Qx8024286@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR conf/51910; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, arved <arved@FreeBSD.org>, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, stable@freebsd.org, Mario <lioux@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: conf/51910: ucom0 should be generated by MAKEDEV all Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:57:59 -0700 (PDT) --- Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2003, David Yeske wrote: > > > ucom0 is not generated from MAKEDEV all > > You haven't said why this is a problem. Since most users don't have these > devices, it's probably up to the ones who do to deal with this. Just a > thought. > > Doug Most users don't have urio0 or umodem0, should we remove those from being generated from MAKEDEV all? When should a device be in MAKEDEV, but not be generated via MAKEDEV all? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305070500.h4750Qx8024286>