Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 23:01:22 -0500 (EST) From: Geoff Wells <geoff@ginsu.com> To: James Robertson <max@underdog.maxie.com> Cc: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>, witr@rwwa.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Another cool hack with FreeBSD... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960117225911.13441C-100000@schwing.ginsu.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960117205119.14064H-100000@underdog.maxie.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, We've had big problems getting any of the different verdor's boxes to "bond" to each other! They all seem to support different schemes. I have heard rumors that 3COM is going with the Ascend MPP "standard" which, as far as I'm concerned, is a good thing. The MPP has worked VERY well for us. Geoff. On Wed, 17 Jan 1996, James Robertson wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Jan 1996, Joe Greco wrote: > > > As long as you're not paying per-minute charges. > True. > > >ISDN doesn't generally do compression. :-) > ISDN itself offers none, but the Pipeline 50's at least do, they use MPPP > which supports STAC data compress on the entire link. I don't know how > wide spread that is supported by other ISDN devices though. > > This idea of multible modems might be something I'll look into one > day ifthe office decides they want a bigger link to the net than they have > now (a 28.8K one), since ISDN is not available at the our current office > location. (Oddly, it WAS available at my house, so all the companies I-net > servers are here.) > > James Robertson > Treetop Internet Services > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960117225911.13441C-100000>