Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Aug 2003 20:35:51 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        gordon@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/devd Makefile
Message-ID:  <20030820183551.GA305@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20030819.194903.10922727.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20030819.092307.61268786.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030819195848.GA32622@madman.celabo.org> <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030819.194903.10922727.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 07:49:03PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com>
>             "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> : On Tuesday, 19 August 2003 at 14:58:48 -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> : > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:23:07AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : >> There were two issues with making devd static: 1) it is a lot smaller
> : >> than haging libstd++ (which isn't the case for all the other
> : >> libraries) and 2) there were issues with crunchgen and c++ programs.
> : >> Making it static just cleans things up a bit.
> : >
> : > but wait, i'm about to commit new, rewritten ls(1), echo(1), rm(1)
> : > and a few others. they are all in C++ (C is obsolete). probably it now
> : > makes sense to move libstdc++.so.4 to /lib?
> : 
> : Once this transition is complete, we should ask ourselves why we still
> : need /usr/bin, /usr/lib and /usr/sbin.
> 
> Or even /usr

It suddenly smells like pinguins here?

:P

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		wilko@FreeBSD.org
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte				



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030820183551.GA305>