Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 04:48:09 -0500 From: Niels Provos <provos@citi.umich.edu> To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: David Rankin <drankin@bohemians.lexington.ky.us>, Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>, "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw@wittsend.com>, Dug Song <dugsong@monkey.org>, security@FreeBSD.org, openssh-unix-dev@mindrot.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal Message-ID: <20000103094910.C359414FB2@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Robert Watson, Mon, 03 Jan 2000 02:28:33 EST
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000103022509.7881A-100000@fledge.watson.org>, Robert Watson writes: >I agree entirely. I'd love to see a free, BSD-licensed, SSH 2.x >implementation out there. The continuing emphasis on improving the >non-standard, albeit widely deployed, SSH 1.x protocol seems to be a less >useful allocation of resources. While a free version of 1.x is extremely >useful, it's not the end-all. :-) If you can get people to upgrade to Actually, Markus' modifications for the 1.6 protocol contain elements that may be reused in a SSH 2.x implementation. I would not call it a waste of time at all. The diff is rather small, more a necessary cleanup. Greetings, Niels. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000103094910.C359414FB2>