Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 21:34:45 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <ersrt5$2t9$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> <ersqpj$9u$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0FE54BD3BF5E89608506E882 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris Kennaway wrote: > I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely > to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good > scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc > locking in CVS. Ok, got it, but the second question is: where is it? Graph on http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/6268.html includes only three FreeBSD-7 configurations, and all show nice scaling. --------------enig0FE54BD3BF5E89608506E882 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF4fLlldnAQVacBcgRAmCPAJ9ABVsUiL3ztKVilJkMH4HfQmgRsACgoBIN P4bY0PwnlJ43AV6wT2H8wzY= =rggs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0FE54BD3BF5E89608506E882--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ersrt5$2t9$1>