Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 05 Jun 2003 18:52:12 -0500
From:      Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
To:        Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion
Message-ID:  <87el28qdzn.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3EDFCD7D.30000@ciam.ru> (Sergey Matveychuk's message of "Fri, 06 Jun 2003 03:08:45 %2B0400")
References:  <3EDE03E3.8090102@ciam.ru> <87y90gqny6.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <3EDFCD7D.30000@ciam.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At 2003-06-05T23:08:45Z, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> writes:

> I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something has
> changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA?

Actually, I used vim and send-pr to send the PR.  However, I *did* do some
copy-and-pasting in Konsole, and that might've been the problem.

> Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash without
> putting path to it into $PATH.  If so port will satisfied. But if the port
> will not found bash in $PATH it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's
> reasonable.

OK, I agree that's reasonable.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+39ez5sRg+Y0CpvERAmJGAJ9RfYq/j8jtFDdHoAE8N7SR1guCggCfXEC6
msGUMYkLMEsT/+9INWVcHAc=
=twZy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87el28qdzn.fsf>