Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 15:33:53 +0300 From: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie@gmail.com> To: "Robert Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UNIX domain sockets MFC's Message-ID: <499c70c0705120533g767ba39dg5495a0c7456036f1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20070512110657.O24765@fledge.watson.org> References: <20070508132149.A24765@fledge.watson.org> <20070511124830.N24765@fledge.watson.org> <499c70c0705111213tddabb55g696bf5dc0fc92f70@mail.gmail.com> <20070511204540.M24765@fledge.watson.org> <499c70c0705111326gac4e215i709e7cbc3d0d9888@mail.gmail.com> <20070512110657.O24765@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/12/07, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 11 May 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > >> The speed improvements associated with these MFC's is minor; primarily they > >> are stability improvements under high load. There are major performance > >> improvements in the 7.x implementation, especially for multi-core systems, > >> but I have no current plans to MFC them, as they interact with other system > >> components and may depend on other changes that also haven't been MFC'd. > > > > Thanks for clearing this up. > > > > How safe is using 7.0 for MySQL server now? > > As Mark has mentioned, you don't want to use -CURRENT for anything > production-oriented. While 7-CURRENT has been a remarkably unbumpy ride, > especially given the scope of the changes made (ZFS, SMP scalability, etc), I > wouldn't run any production services on it until it becomes 7-STABLE later > this year. > > However, if you have a high volume workload that you want to work really well > with 7.x, and you can do testing, now would be a really good time to start > doing that. Almost all major feature changes are now present in the 7-CURRENT > branch, so the next four months are all about getting it into shape for the > 7.0 release. Even if it panics on the first day you run a test workload > against it, submit a bug report and keep with it until it runs perfectly. > :-) The way development branches become stable branches is that people who > care about making it happen test the new release until they're happy with it, > reporting bugs, fixing bugs, etc, so any help you can provide would be greatly > appreciated! > > Robert N M Watson > Computer Laboratory > University of Cambridge > I'm csuping to HEAD now :) What options shall I remove to avoid the slowness and to gain the SMP performance of it? while I could debug if something got crashed -- Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0705120533g767ba39dg5495a0c7456036f1>