Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:10:01 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Lindstr=F6m?= <bkhl@elektrubadur.se> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/68179: New port: misc/dtach Message-ID: <20040622081001.GE31428@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <200406212300.i5LN0V9m000889@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200406212300.i5LN0V9m000889@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:00:31PM +0000, Björn Lindström wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/68179; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: bkhl@elektrubadur.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?Bj=F6rn_Lindstr=F6m?=) > To: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> > Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: ports/68179: New port: misc/dtach > Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:53:15 +0200 > > --=-=-= > > Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> writes: > > > - the shar was slightly incorrectly built (does not create dtach/ > > directory); > > Fixed. > > > - the pkg-descr is wrong (one very long line, no WWW) - have you run > > portlint on the port? > > Fixed. > > > - the program itself does strange things upon reception of SIGWINCH, > > which looks very bad for this particular program > > (detaching/attaching in a terminal of a different size). This is no > > big deal from the ports collection point of view, but still if no > > good. > > I'll report this to the developer. Next iteration: did you check pkg-plist? You install some docs (not respecting NOPORTDOCS), but they are not listed. \Anton. -- Floating point will almost always have enough precision for the task at hand, and by the time it doesn't, it will. :-) -- Larry Wall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622081001.GE31428>